AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4 GB Review (2024)

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4 GB Review (1)348Architecture»

Introduction

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4 GB Review (2)

To say that AMD is at the forefront of new technology in the PC-graphics field is an understatement. The company rigorously pursues and in many cases introduces new technology into the PC consumer-graphics space. AMD's past two memorable technological breakthroughs in this space were Graphics CoreNext, a powerful new number-crunching machinery for the GPU, which made not just AMD, but also a lot of crypto-currency enthusiasts a lot of money, and the first GPU with GDDR5 memory in their giant-killing Radeon HD 4870. The past year hasn't been kind to AMD in terms of GPU-market share, which is partly because the company didn't introduce anything major since 2013; all due to competition from NVIDIA with its "Maxwell" architecture and probably also because the company is focusing on high-volume ISV deals, such as new-generation game consoles, and the development of the chip we're reviewing today, the Radeon R9 Fury X.

The R9 Fury X is not a case of AMD taking its existing tech and up-scaling it. The company probably can't do that anymore. AMD and NVIDIA's common foundry partner for GPUs, TSMC, has seen major setbacks in implementing its next silicon fabrication tech, which threw both companies' product-development cycles off the track. While it hit NVIDIA hard, which had to rework its "Maxwell" architecture for the existing 28 nm process, it hit AMD harder. The company was already hitting 275W TBP (typical board power) with its previous-gen high-end chip, the R9 290X, and making the kind of SIMD increase that it did with its new chip could have adversely affected TBP. The card has the same exact TBP as the R9 290X at 275W, but at a whopping 45% increase in its number-crunching machinery. So AMD has obviously done something very big with the physically very small R9 Fury X - High Bandwidth Memory (HBM).

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4 GB Review (3)

Stacked High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) is the biggest innovation in video card memory since GDDR5 (circa summer 2008). It is complemented by a transfer of video memory from physical chips surrounding the GPU package - over 32-bit-wide data paths, each. More on this later.

The Radeon R9 290 and R9 290X hit NVIDIA's high-end GPU lineup back in fall-2013. The $399 R9 290 was faster than the $999 GTX TITAN and the $650 GTX 780; while the R9 290X held out on its own until NVIDIA made a product intervention with the GTX 780 Ti and GTX TITAN Black to reclaim those two price points. That didn't affect AMD's competitiveness until NVIDIA launched the "Maxwell" based GTX 970 and GTX 980. Some of the major complaints with the R9 290/X were that it was very hot and noisy. We dreaded the prospect of a dual-GPU card based on the "Hawaii" silicon, but were pleasantly surprised when the dual-GPU R9 295X2 turned out to be cooler and quieter than single-GPU NVIDIA chips. It could do so because AMD tapped into liquid cooling. The card shipped with a factory-fitted, close-loop liquid cooler. Close-loop liquid coolers for CPUs were taking off around the same time, and so the two-piece contraption strung together by coolant tubes didn't really affect the product's standing with buyers. NVIDIA launching a prohibitively expensive GTX TITAN-Z helped too. Given the Radeon Fury X has the same board-power rating as the R9 290X, AMD also gave it a liquid-cooling solution in an effort to clinch the heat-and-noise game against NVIDIA's high-end "Maxwell" GPUs, including the GTX Titan X and the more recently launched GTX 980 Ti.

AMD is pricing the Radeon Fury X at US $650. This and $550 have traditionally been the price-points at which AMD launches its high-end, single-GPU products. NVIDIA prepared for this product launch by introducing the GTX 980 Ti at $650, based on the same silicon as the GTX Titan X, and cutting pricing of the $550 GTX 980 down to $500. The Radeon R9 Fury X has its task cut out for itself in repeating the R9 290 series launch in which the biggest winner was the consumer.

Radeon Fury X Market Segment Analysis
Radeon
R9 390X
GeForce
GTX 780 Ti
GeForce
GTX 980
Radeon
Fury X
GeForce
GTX 980 Ti
GeForce
GTX Titan X
Radeon
R9 295X2
Shader Units2816288020484096281630722x 2816
ROPs6448646496962x 64
Graphics ProcessorHawaiiGK110GM204FijiGM200GM2002x Hawaii
Transistors6200M7100M5200M8900M8000M8000M2x 6200M
Memory Size8192 MB3072 MB4096 MB4096 MB6144 MB12288 MB2x 4096 MB
Memory Bus Width512 bit384 bit256 bit4096 bit384 bit384 bit2x 512 bit
Core Clock1050 MHz876 MHz+1126 MHz+1050 MHz1000 MHz+1000 MHz+1018 MHz
Memory Clock1500 MHz1750 MHz1750 MHz500 MHz1750 MHz1750 MHz1250 MHz
Price$430$390$480$650$650$1050$620

').appendTo('body');$(window).scroll(nextPageScrollHandler);}if (evt.touches.length==0)$('#keep-scrolling-buffer').removeClass('show');else {if ($('#keep-scrolling').hasClass('show'))$('#keep-scrolling-buffer').addClass('show');}});});

');$('.tpu-fancybox-wrap').css('maxWidth', maxWidth);*/instance.$refs.stage.on('transitionend', function() {updateButtonPos(instance);});},onUpdate: updateButtonPos,afterShow: function(instance, slide) {updateButtonPos(instance);instance.$refs.inner.find('.fancybox-tpu-nav').show();},beforeClose: function(instance, slide) {instance.$refs.inner.find('.fancybox-tpu-nav').hide();},afterClose: function(instance, slide) {$('.tpu-fancybox-wrap').contents().unwrap();$('body').removeClass('tpu-fancybox-body-wrap')},baseTpl: '

',});});}loadjs.ready(['jquery', 'fancybox'], function() {attachLightbox(function() {return $('.text a:has(>img)').filter(function(i, el) {return $(this).attr('href').match(/\.(jpg|gif|png)(?=$|[?#])/) != null;});});});loadjs.ready(['jquery'], function() {$('.review').on('click', '.spoiler > a', function(e) {e.preventDefault();$(this).next('div').toggle();});$('.review').on('click', '.ispoiler', function(e) {e.preventDefault();$(this).find('div').css('filter', '');$(this).removeClass('ispoiler');});});loadjs.ready(['jquery'], function() {$('table.tputbl.sort-header').find('th[scope=col]').css('cursor', 'pointer').on('click', function(e) {var header=$(this)header.parents('table').find('th[scope=col]').removeClass('sort-active');header.addClass('sort-active');var idx=header.parents('tr').find('th[scope=col]').index(this);header.parents('table').find('td, th[scope=row]').filter(function() {return $(this).index() == idx;}).sortElementsTPU(function(a, b) {a=$(a).text(); b=$(b).text();if (header.hasClass('sort-force-number')) {a=parseInt(a, 10);b=parseInt(b, 10);}if (header.hasClass('sort-nan-is-zero')) {if (isNaN(a))a=0;if (isNaN(b))b=0;}try {var result=a.localeCompare(b, undefined, { numeric: true, sensitivity: 'base' });return result;} catch(e) {if (a>b) return 1;if (a

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4 GB Review (2024)

FAQs

Is the R9 Fury still supported? ›

AMD Is Retiring Driver Support for R9 Fury and Older Cards Including Pre-Ryzen APUs. This announcement comes hot on the heels of AMD's latest Adrenalin driver, 21.6. 1 that was just released yesterday and is the first official Radeon driver to not support these legacy devices and Windows 7.

Is the AMD R9 good for gaming? ›

The Radeon R9 290 is an AMD video card categorized as Enthusiast. It is 11 generations old. The Radeon R9 290 will run 95% of the top 12,000 PC games. It will also run 73% of these games at the recommended or best experience levels.

Is R9 Fury good? ›

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 Fury is just 8.48%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 Fury performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Is the R9 290X still good? ›

since the 290x still can run most modern games pretty well. Windows 10 goes end of support next year, then you'll be in the same boat with that, but for now at least it's a supported OS. I used to have a 290X also and ran that for many years cause there really wasn't a generational upgrade clear up through the RX 580.

How much power does the R9 fury use? ›

The Fury cards have a several percent performance lead over the GTX 980, but their power consumption in turn is much, much higher. The difference is between 62W and 109W at the wall, closer to large, power-hungry cards like the R9 Fury X and GTX 980 Ti than the smaller GTX 980 that the R9 Fury is competing with.

What is the resolution of the R9 fury? ›

Summary
Max Screen Resolution‎2560 x 1600
Graphics Card Ram Size‎4 GB
Graphics RAM Type‎GDDR5
Included Components‎installation cd
Compatible Devices‎Desktop
7 more rows

What is the Nvidia equivalent to the R9? ›

A R9 380 would be equivalent to an overclocked GTX 770, GTX 960 or a stock GTX 1050 Ti.

Is AMD 9 overkill? ›

Find out how we test here. The new AMD series of CPUs are incredibly fast and built with a large number of cores. With 12 cores, the Ryzen 9 7900X is overkill for gaming. There is no gaming set that would utilize this amount of cores and power.

Is Radeon graphics enough for gaming? ›

AMD Radeon™ graphics are ideal complement for Ryzen™ processors, delivering the image quality and frame rate that visual thinkers, content creators, and dedicated gamers demand.

Can a R9 290X run 4k? ›

The 3840x2160 option is available, but only at 30 Hz max.

How much power does a Radeon R9 290X need? ›

AMD R9-290X - On your average system the card requires you to have a 550~600 Watt power supply unit. AMD R9-290X Crossfire - On your average system the cards require you to have a 800 Watt power supply unit as minimum.

Is R9 290 still supported? ›

All R9-2xx Series GPU cards are considered to be legacy and not supported with AMD driver updates anymore. So there are no Windows 11 AMD VGA Driver available.

When did the R9 fury come out? ›

The Radeon R9 FURY was a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched on July 10th, 2015.

What games can an R9 370 run? ›

What games can the Radeon R9 370 run?
RankGame
1Elden Ring
2Grand Theft Auto V
3Red Dead Redemption 2
98 more rows

Is the AMD Radeon R7 200 series still supported? ›

In an official blog post, AMD confirmed it is retiring a large number of its graphics card today. Starting with Adrenalin 21.6. 1 driver graphics card from Radeon Fury, Radeon 300, as well as Radeon 200 series, will no longer be supported, as all these cards have been moved to the legacy section.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Edwin Metz

Last Updated:

Views: 5846

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (78 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Edwin Metz

Birthday: 1997-04-16

Address: 51593 Leanne Light, Kuphalmouth, DE 50012-5183

Phone: +639107620957

Job: Corporate Banking Technician

Hobby: Reading, scrapbook, role-playing games, Fishing, Fishing, Scuba diving, Beekeeping

Introduction: My name is Edwin Metz, I am a fair, energetic, helpful, brave, outstanding, nice, helpful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.